Skip to content
WWave WorkshopMORNING BRIEF

CLIENT EXPERIENCE · FICTIONAL EXAMPLE

Your morning research brief.

Three examples show how the planned service separates a developing pattern, a squeeze scenario and a paper pullback. These are not today’s trades.

Example coverage—not the actual stock universe
ExampleMethod / timeframeStatusOpen chart
DEMO ACup & handle4HWaiting for breakoutOpen annotated example →
DEMO BSqueeze releaseDailyRelease illustratedOpen annotated example →
DEMO CTrend pullback · paperDaily / 4H monitoringNext-open paper planOpen annotated example →

4H · Waiting for breakout

Fictional

DEMO A · Cup & handle

Open annotated chart — exact pattern, target and stop →
Entry reference100.00
Stop95.00
Target116.00
Gross illustrative R:R3.20:1

Why examine it? A rounded recovery returns to a horizontal rim. The shallow handle leaves a defined breakout level and a visible place where the idea fails.

What must happen? Wait for a completed 4H close above 100 and review the available fill. A touch of the rim is not a confirmed breakout.

Target basis. Measured cup depth: 100 + (100 − 84) = 116.

Risk and alternative. The example stop is 95, below the handle. A failed breakout or loss of the handle weakens the setup; there is no verified Elliott origin in this example.

At the fictional reference: risk 5.00%, reward 16.00%. Excludes costs and gaps; no filled trade.

Daily · Release illustrated

Fictional

DEMO B · Squeeze release

Open annotated chart — exact pattern, target and stop →
Entry reference52.00
Stop49.00
Target58.00
Gross illustrative R:R2.00:1

Why examine it? A narrow price range gives way to an upward move. The example separates the compression state from the directional entry rule.

What must happen? A squeeze release alone does not determine direction or guarantee acceleration. An actual report must verify the frozen squeeze settings, momentum and entry date.

Target basis. Separate example target model: 52 + 2 × (52 − 49) = 58.

Risk and alternative. The illustrative stop is 49. The fixed target is a separate 2R example model, not an intrinsic TTM Squeeze target.

At the fictional reference: risk 5.77%, reward 11.54%. Excludes costs and gaps; no filled trade.

Daily / 4H monitoring · Next-open paper plan

Fictional

DEMO C · Trend pullback · paper

Open annotated chart — exact pattern, target and stop →
Entry reference80.00
Stop76.00
Target86.00
Gross illustrative R:R1.50:1

Why examine it? A short pullback within a rising daily trend becomes a paper candidate only when the stock and lagged benchmark filters also pass.

What must happen? Entry is only at the next regular-session open. Its price is unknown here; recheck gaps, costs and eligibility before any hypothetical fill.

Target basis. Illustrative ATR = 2: stop = 80 − 2 × 2 = 76; target = 80 + 3 × 2 = 86.

Risk and alternative. The 76 stop is a tactical ATR level. It is not an Elliott boundary. Paper exits also depend on RSI2 and holding time under the frozen rules.

At the fictional reference: risk 5.00%, reward 7.50%. Excludes costs and gaps; no filled trade. This nominal example does not calculate the frozen paper strategy’s net entry eligibility.

What a real edition must include

Actual coverage and failures, exchange and completed-bar timestamps, source/settings, verified indicators, earnings context, the competing count and a reviewable outcome history. None of those is implied by this fictional sample.

Back to the proposed membership →